Cases 61 - 70 of 126
Averitt v. Arnold
as 3:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
Billy Averitt
Defendant:
Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GALICKI et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY GALICKI , JOY GALICKI , ELI GALICKI and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CHRISTOPHER JAMES CHRISTIE, BRIDGET ANNE KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Royland Muse v. Robert Arnold, et al
as 13-6378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYLAND D. MUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT ARNOLD, OFFICIAL OFFICERS OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CPT. PARKER F/N/U #423 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Arnold et al
as 3:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Carter
Defendant:
Robert Arnold, f/n/u Gaither, f/n/u Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHARPE v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 7:2013cv00011
Petitioner:
ROBERT ARNOLD SHARPE, JR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carter v. Arnold et al
as 3:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Brian Dale Carter
Defendant:
Robert Arnold, Rutherford County Detention Center, f/n/u Gaither and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Arnold et al
as 3:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Brown
Defendant:
Robert Arnold and Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskette v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv01092
Plaintiff:
Tammy Baskette
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee , Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Bradley v. Arnold et al
as 3:2012cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jordan Bradley
Defendant:
Robert Arnold and Rutherford County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
