Cases 61 - 70 of 641
GARRETT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Howard Garrett
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Executive Director RICHARD BROWN, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSTON v. DOLLERIS et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
GERALD JOHNSTON
Defendant:
TROY DOLLERIS, ROGER NEWLON, BRENT MILLER and others
Not Classified By Court:
TODD VARE and MITCHELL L. OSTERDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS Rogers v. United States
as 1:2022cv00008
Defendant:
United States of America, Anthony Rogers and United States
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. PetSmart LLC
as 3:2021cv00949
Plaintiff:
Veronica Rogers
Defendant:
PetSmart LLC and PetSmart, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03037
Plaintiff:
ROGER D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KING v. BRANHAM et al
as 1:2021cv03008
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. KING, JR.
Defendant:
MIKE BRANHAM, ANDREW VERBOCHT, JOHN COCHRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD et al v. ROZIJIA et al
as 2:2021cv00447
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
ROZIJIA, CHAPLIN ROGERS, OFFICER RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS Rogers v. United States
as 1:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GODWIN v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROGER GODWIN
Defendant:
GILBERT, DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
