Cases 61 - 70 of 162
Landsman-Roos
as 1:2018mc00153
Petitioner:
Nicolas Tyler Landsman-Roos
Cause Of Action: M 09-282 Attorney Change of Name
Estate of Jacob Paul Roos v. Dragstra Brothers, Inc
as 5:2018cv04037
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jacob Paul Roos
Defendant:
Dragstra Brothers, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Estate of Jacob Paul Roos v. Dragstra Brothers, Inc
as 1:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jacob Paul Roos
Defendant:
Dragstra Brothers, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McFarland v. Kullojka et al
as 2:2018cv00457
Plaintiff:
Samuel Marvin Lee McFarland
Defendant:
Arben Kullojka and Aaron J. Roos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gage et al
as 2:2018cv00218
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Bruce C. Gage, Karie Rainer, Dan Schneeweiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gage et al
as 2:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Bruce C Gage, Karie Rainer, Dan Schneeweiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Roos et al
as 2:2018cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Roos, Bishop, Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gage et al
as 3:2017cv06076
Plaintiff:
James A Williams
Defendant:
Bruce Gage, Karie Rainer, Tim Thrasher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gess v. Medina et al.
as 1:2017cv03061
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gess
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Arlin R Peterson, ST. Mary Corwin Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Backer v. USD 30 Billion MTN Programme
as 17-3492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Backer
Defendant - Appellee:
Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A., hereinafter "Rabobank", FKA Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A., Rabo Securities USA, Inc., Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and others
Defendant:
Rabo AgriFinance LLC, De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc., Rabobank USA Financial Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
