Cases 61 - 70 of 13,458
Derwin Jules Jackson v. T.L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Derwin Jules Jackson
Respondent:
T. L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stochevski v. Weingarten et al
as 3:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Walter Stochevski
Defendant:
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt, Charlene T. Begley and others
Angelo T. Gullotti v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv02744
Plaintiff:
Angelo T. Gullotti
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Naemi v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Naema Naemi
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
(HC) Saenz v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Robert G. Saenz
Respondent:
T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morvarid Emamy v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Morvarid Emamy
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. Lichtblau et al
as 3:2024cv02033
Defendant:
Elisabeth Soloway, Sheila Shah Lichtblau, Lisa Soloway and others
Plaintiff:
Diana V. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedric Garnett Johnson v. Travis Pennington et al
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cedric Garnett Johnson
Defendant:
Travis Pennington, D. Mortimer, D. Tristan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
