Cases 61 - 70 of 160
Boschert v. LVNV Funding LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00802
Plaintiff:
Kara R. Boschert
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC and Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ostrander v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
as 5:2015cv11526
Plaintiff:
Warren Ostrander
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BATISTE v. TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC et al
as 2:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
LAUREL BATISTE
Defendant:
TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC and LVNV FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McMahon v. LVNV Funding, LLC et al
as ILN/1:12-cv-01410
Plaintiff:
Scott McMahon
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC , Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. , Alegis Group, LLC and others
Movant:
Sherman Financial Group LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roberson v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01000
Plaintiff:
Sara Roberson
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc. and LVNV Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mackowiak v. Central Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01961
Plaintiff:
Robert Mackowiak
Defendant:
Central Credit Services, Inc. , LVNV Funding LLC , Sherman Originator LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COUGHLIN v. TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02509
Plaintiff:
CONNIE L. COUGHLIN
Defendant:
TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC., FIRST FINANCIAL ASSET MGMT, INC. and FIRST FINANCIAL INVESTMENT FUND V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
