Cases 61 - 70 of 123
Miller v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00360
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fay Miller
Defendant:
Tucson, City of and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kaczynski et al
as 4:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ronald Johnson
Defendant:
Brett Kaczynski, Mary Pekas, Billy Perrin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boteo-Flores v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Pima, County of and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castanos v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Horacio Alberto Castanos
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Mark Ewings, Pima County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02596
Plaintiff:
Rita Davis
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Anthony Kadous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02487
Plaintiff:
Sean Adrian
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Tucson Police Department and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. University of Arizona Police Department et al
as 4:2014cv02453
Defendant:
University of Arizona Police Department, Tucson Fire Department, Tucson Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Deyoe R Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Elem v. Tucson Police Department
as 14-16917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY A. ELEM
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Larry Elem v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Offic, et al
as 14-16918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY A. ELEM
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON CITY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, named as City Court Prosecutor's Office and TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.