Cases 61 - 70 of 395
THURMOND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01600
Plaintiff:
ADARIUS C THURMOND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Danielle Martinez, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56404
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF, Fremont and Riverside, IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
T. W., a minor by his Guardian ad Litem Dahl Johnson, P. C., a minor by her Guardian ad Litem Raven Campbell, AMBER WOOD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Busch (Delgado)
as 21-2294
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cody Busch, Tony Peebles, AKA Tone, Kyle Eagan, AKA Bow Wow and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan Delgado, AKA Jmag
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
