Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Gividen v. Kane et al
as 2:2010cv02546
Petitioner:
Joan Ada Gividen
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Unknown Party, Ann L DeMarais and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Matsumoto v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 2:2010cv00639
Plaintiff:
Honey Murleen Matsumoto
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, United States Department of Justice and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Acosta v. United States Marshals Office et al
as 2:2009cv00244
Plaintiff:
Hanoi Barbaro Acosta
Defendant:
United States Marshals Office, Unknown U.S. Marshal on Duty, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Schipke v. Gilkey et al
as 2:2008cv01956
Petitioner:
Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Respondent:
Charles Gilkey, Corrections Corporation of America and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gentry v. Central AZ Detention Center et al
as 2:2008cv00973
Petitioner:
Ira W. Gentry, Jr.
Respondent:
Central AZ Detention Center and United States Marshall's Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Berryman v. United States Marshal et al
as 2:2008cv00667
Plaintiff:
Benny Dan Berryman
Defendant:
United States Marshal, Bill Doe and Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fishman v. United States Marshall Service
as 2:2008cv00308
Plaintiff:
Stanley Fishman
Defendant:
United States Marshall Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conroy v. United States Marshal et al
as 2:2008cv00182
Petitioner:
Jack Charles Conroy
Respondent:
United States Marshal and Joe Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
