Cases 61 - 70 of 113
Prokosa v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Basyl Prokosa
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Paul Steel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 134
Pozin v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv01438
Plaintiff:
Mark Pozin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Chris Chattin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Price v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2015cv00599
Plaintiff:
Valerie Lynn Price
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Jacquese Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Singletary v. Bibby et al
as 2:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Leah Singletary
Defendant:
Neil P. Bibby and The United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Maynard v. United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General
as 4:2014cv00275
Movant:
Ansel M. Maynard
Respondent:
United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burk et al v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2014mi00005
Petitioner:
Ronald Eric Burk , Linda Saunders , Janet Scruggs and others
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
THOMPSON-LONG v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
SANDRA D THOMPSON-LONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cole v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
Michael Cole
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Atlanta Airlines Terminal Corporation and CH2M Hill Engineers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Taylor v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Warren Adam Taylor
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Patrick R. Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251
Harris v. United States Postal Services at Augusta State Medical Prison
as 1:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ian Harris
Defendant:
United States Postal Services at Augusta State Medical Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
