Cases 61 - 70 of 410
Lyke v. Dixon Correctional Center
as 3:2021cv50066
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Lyke
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center, Dr. Lankz, John R. Varga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. McCraw et al
as 3:2021cv50046
Defendant:
McCraw, Illinois Department of Corrections, Dixon Corr. Ctr. and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval De Vargas v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07792
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Ramona Sandoval De Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Village of Park Forest et al
as 1:2020cv07473
Defendant:
Officer Rimovsky, Officer Bregin, D.C. Habecker and others
Plaintiff:
Javon Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ranft v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2020cv50457
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Devin L Schafer, Christine McClimons and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ranft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv50413
Defendant:
Sgt. Mrs. Rodriguez, Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Heferfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv50396
Defendant:
Killmer, Lt. Rimmers, Colin S. Brinkmeier and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Allen Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Hamiton et al
as 4:2020cv04207
Plaintiff:
Sentoro Dunn
Defendant:
. Varga, . Wheats, Robert Hamiton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv05464
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
Jairo Erazo Vargas and Erazo Vargas
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Richardson v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2020cv04194
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Rob Jeffreys, Robert Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
