Cases 61 - 70 of 812
Nelson v. Service Towing Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv10918
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Nelson and John Doe
Defendant:
Service Towing Inc., Able Towing LLC, Edward D. Hertz and others
BDE WARREN, LLC v. CITY OF BERKLEY
as 2:2022cv10913
Plaintiff:
BDE WARREN, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF BERKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren #245972 v. Jackson
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Warren #245972
Defendant:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik v. D&W Awning & Window Co. et al
as 1:2022cv10664
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Malik and Jason M. Malik [E-Filer]
Defendant:
D&W Awning & Window Co., Hutchinson, Warren & Associates, Inc., Muller, Muller, Richmond & Harms, P.C. and others
Krieger et al v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv10647
Plaintiff:
Andrew Krieger, David Krieger, James Sperling and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mitton et al v. Christian Insurance Group, et al
as 1:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Amber Mitton, Shani Rasor, Cameron Cook and others
Defendant:
Christian Insurance Group, d/b/a Christian Financial, Jacob Hagg, Noah Bushnell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hale v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2022cv10580
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Hale
Defendant:
Michael Bouchard, Well Path Health Care, Craig Diamond and others
Artis v Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv10537
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Artis
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, State of Michigan, K. Gaines and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harville v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2022cv10154
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Harville
Defendant:
City of Warren, James Twardesky, Gregory Booton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
