Cases 61 - 70 of 507
WICKHAM v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J WICKHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kentrell Welch v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-17017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENTRELL D. WELCH
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, LISA WALSH, BARTTLETT and others
Shawn Flynn v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN FLYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, ROMEO ARANAS and others
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate et al v. City of Bartlesville et al
as 4:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tate, Garry W Richardson and Kelly R Dickey
Defendant:
City of Bartlesville, Neighborhood Services Code Enforcement, Mila Wickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zuniga v. Daniels et al
as 2:2022cv01966
Plaintiff:
Edmundo A. Zuniga
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, John Borrowman, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alito Cross v. Buschman, et al
as 22-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALITO TIJWAN CROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
PHYSICIAN'S ASS WICKHAM, H. QUAY and BUSCHMAN
Asusta v. Daniels et al
as 2:2022cv01947
Plaintiff:
Isaac Asusta
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, John Borrowman, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr. Terminated per FAC
Langford v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Justin Odell Langford
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Steve Sisolak, Scott Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
