Cases 61 - 70 of 743
Yang v. Moye et al
as 2:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kay Yang
Defendant:
Robert M Moye, BeLinda Mathie, Lauren Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Cynthia DeNicolo v. Hubbard Radio Chicago, LLC
as 22-3284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYNTHIA DENICOLO
Defendant / Appellee:
HUBBARD RADIO CHICAGO, LLC
Swain v. Maurakis et al
as 1:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Tyler Jerome Swain
Defendant:
Theodore G Maurakis, Abdul Odwuh and All City Hip Hop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Williams v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv07356
Plaintiff:
Vincent Williams
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
BIK HYDRAULICS LTD v. GRAY et al
as 3:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
BIK HYDRAULICS LTD
Defendant:
RYAN GRAY, R.L. GRAYS UNDERGROUND LLC and GRAY'S TREE & CRANE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INC. et al v. TINDER'S MATCH GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01900
Plaintiff:
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INC. and CONCEPT LUXURY LLC.
Defendant:
TINDER'S MATCH GROUP, INC., (EPIC GAMES) TENCENT HOLDING'S, GOOGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
RODERICK v. SORRELL et al
as 1:2022cv01856
Plaintiff:
BYRON RODERICK
Defendant:
BROOKYLNN SORRELL, SHANDA NOLLEY and BROOKLYNN SORRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
ADEGBOYEGA v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01724
Plaintiff:
KEHINDE ADEGBOYEGA
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Avellone v. Barrows
as 3:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
Christopher Avellone
Defendant:
Karissa Barrows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
