Cases 71 - 80 of 32,817
Grubb v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Grubb
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan, Laura Plappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Louisville Metro Corrections Medical Staff
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Darinaija Moon and Duwan Mudd
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. Louisville Metro Corrections
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Darinaija Moon
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Decker v. Lilita Infante, et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
LILITA INFANTE, D.E.A. Special Agent, JASON HAYES, Task Force Officer, aka Jason Heyes, RAPHAEL GARCIA, U.S. Postal Inspector Service and others
Castro-Mota v. Bobby et al.
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Warden David Bobby, Cousel Master, Counsel Haad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Plymouth Township Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11029
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene McDowell
Defendant:
Plymouth Township Police Department, Plymouth Township Police Department, Commissioner of, Plymouth Township Police Department, Chief of and others
Bushner v. Kerner et al
as 2:2024cv01861
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Bushner
Defendant:
Investigator Eric Kerner, Investigator John/Jane Tabor, Captain John/Jane Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Steve Rollins
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
