Cases 71 - 80 of 90,506
Mongeau v. Blinken et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keegan Haig Mongeau
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Marissa Scott and Aimee Cutrona
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Noeller et al v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Kristin N Noeller and Shawn T Hinkle
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01355
Plaintiff:
David Renald Johnson
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bey v. Jars Cannabis Dispensary et al
as 2:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Miyana Sa'kira Nubian Bey
Defendant:
Jars Cannabis Dispensary, Matthew Dubkinsky and Sarah Stalker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Buchanan v. Childers
as 4:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
Ralph James Buchanan, Jr.
Respondent:
Unknown Childers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Zamora #141929 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
Eric Castorena Zamora
Defendant:
NaphCare, Ryan Thornell and Katie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overstreet v. Lucid USA Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01356
Petitioner:
Cornele A Overstreet
Respondent:
Lucid USA Incorporated
Milton v. Nikola Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv01359
Defendant:
Sooyean Jin, Nikola Corporation, Britton Worthen and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Milton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
