Cases 71 - 80 of 3,703
Tellez Camacho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-705
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO TELLEZ CAMACHO, THALIA TELLEZ CONTRERAS, OCTAVIO TELLEZ CONTRERAS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Contreras v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Dominicqua Contreras
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Hicks
as 24-271
Defendant:
MARCEL WORTHY, RODERICK ARRINGTON, LETORRANCE TRAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AARON HICKS, Boog and Boogy
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Josmar Eduardo Terrones Arroyo v. Transporation Solutions DP, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Josmar Eduardo Terrones Arroyo
Defendant:
Transporation Solutions DP, Inc., Joe Alfredo Contreras and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Castaneda v. Perfekta Colombian Shapewear, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Martha Castaneda
Defendant:
Perfekta Colombian Shapewear, Inc. and Maria S. Contreras
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Avel Bacudio v. Claire Contreras
as 2:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Avel Bacudio
Defendant:
Claire Contreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mario Contreras v. United States
as 24-1113
Plaintiff:
Mario M. Contreras
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
