Cases 71 - 80 of 5,862
Dodson et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01189
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dodson, Nannie Dunbar, Colleen Dunwoody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Howell v. Asous et al
as 0:2024cv60256
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Howell
Defendant:
Milan Asous, Dejarnira Richmond and Eric Strzalkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morales v. Sheddy, et al.
as 24-792
Plaintiff:
YOANDY FERNANDEZ MORALES
Defendant:
SHEDDY, STEVEN, Dr. AGUSTIN and others
Howell v. Rhode Island Housing Authority, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY and RI OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Howell v. Boston Medical Center Hospital, et al
as 24-1142
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Howell v. Middlesex Community College, et al
as 24-1143
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE and MASSACHUSETTS REHABILITATION COMMISSION
Howell v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, et al
as 24-1144
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Henry SmithIn re: Henry Smith
as 24-10456
Petitioner:
In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent:
MARY B. WINDOM, JENNIFER M. HOWELL, DONALD MCMILLIAN and others
Howell et al v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
as 9:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mark Howell and Leslie Howell
Defendant:
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Howell v. Brookline Bancorp Building Staff and Presidents, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
BROOKLINE BANCORP, INC., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
