Cases 71 - 80 of 608
Vasquez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Noe S. Perez Vasquez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Perez-Perez et al v. Klonninklijke Philips, N.V et al
as 2:2022cv00497
Plaintiff:
Claribel Perez-Perez, Jorge Caceres-Seda and Conjugal Partnership Caceres-Perez
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA HOLDING CORPORATION, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maymi v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Perez Maymi
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
MR. JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. JAIME SORBER and JANE/JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Perez v. Warden of SCI-Huntingdon et al
as 3:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
Terrance Xavier Perez
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Huntingdon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. Teresinski et al
as 2:2021cv05020
Plaintiff:
Marcus Perez
Defendant:
Jerome T Teresinski and Anthony D Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04796
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BADGER v. PEREZ et al
as 5:2021cv04747
Plaintiff:
PETER BADGER
Defendant:
JUSTIN PEREZ, DENNIS RIVAS, MATTHEW BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
