Cases 71 - 80 of 129
Firewalker-Fields v. Robertson et al
as 1:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Defendant:
S. Robertson, E. Shaw and W. Jaratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Richmond Sherriff/Jail
as 3:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Steve Robertson
Defendant:
Richmond Sheriff/Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Medical Pamunkey Regional et al
as 3:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Steven Maurice Robertson
Defendant:
Medical Pamunkey Regional and Officer Pamunkey Regional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Altschuler v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2015cv00695
Plaintiff:
Gus Phillip Altschuler
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia , Rector and Board of Visitors of Longwood University , W. Taylor Reveley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Robertson v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00300
Plaintiff:
Tammy Robertson
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
X v. Robinson et al
as 3:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
A. D. Robinson, Harold Clarke, Gregory Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malon v. Franklin Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
Andrew Malon
Defendant:
Franklin Financial Corporation , Richard T. Wheeler, Jr. , Hugh T. Harrison, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kershner v. Davis et al
as 2:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
Toby Kershner
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Mr. Parker, J. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant:
City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Robertson v. Wilson
as 2:2014cv00311
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Robertson
Defendant:
Eric D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
