Cases 71 - 80 of 97
SISK v. OSBURN et al
as 2:2013cv00122
Defendant:
SGT. ARNOLD, OFFICER BLUE, OFFICER BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAVELY v. CARAWAY
as 2:2013cv00085
Respondent:
J. F. CARAWAY
Petitioner:
WATKINS C. GRAVELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Thelma Rose Watkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SOBIN v. RASNER et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, KEVIN GILMORE, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. SOBIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
INDIANA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, INC. v. TOWN OF MOORESVILLE et al
as 1:2012cv01493
Defendant:
JEFFREY M. COOK, ANTHONY LANGLEY, MARK MATHIS and others
Plaintiff:
INDIANA-AMERICAN WATER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2012cv00491
Plaintiff:
Randy E Watkins, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
IN RE: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS
as 1:2012mc00048
Respondent:
LINDSAY T. BOYD, LOUIS W. DENNEY, BRADLEY D. HAMILTON and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASES OF:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Flores v. Amones et al
as 2:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Karen Flores
Defendant:
Reid Amones , Joellen Raby , Johnny Goodlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
