Cases 71 - 80 of 318
Osborne v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv02260
Plaintiff:
William Frank Osborne
Defendant:
T. Blewett, Collette Peters, K. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yela Fiduciary Services, LLC et al v. Benton County et al
as 6:2020cv01925
Defendant:
Benton County, Evan Mohr, Lance Loberg and others
Plaintiff:
Yela Fiduciary Services, LLC and Emery Sund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01902
Plaintiff:
Gwen Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emery v. Gower et al
as 2:2020cv01691
Defendant:
S. Martin, Ms. Isles, Ms. L. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walkup et al v. Division of Child Support et al
as 3:2020cv01554
Defendant:
Jonathan Tucker, Andrew Long, Kate Feddersen and others
Plaintiff:
Gianna B. Jackson and Kelli Sue Walkup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01402
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sancho v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant:
Michael Hammond, Brady Bjorkland, Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Anthony Sancho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv01090
Defendant:
S. Johnston, C. Digiulio, Dr. Vriesman and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Gill et al
as 6:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Richard Fredricks, Gregory Magnus, Incorporated City of Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Alexi Elias Ghenatos, Christina Chapman, Amanda Dupray-Raley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. 1450 SE Orient, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant:
Denise K. Concannon, Michael R. Munzing, Aligra Marie Rainy and others
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
