Cases 71 - 80 of 826
Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear
as 23-6499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Duncan v. Locklear
as 5:2023ct03149
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Steven Earl Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Mitchell Locklear
as 23-6454
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MITCHELL RAY LOCKLEAR, a/k/a Black Mitchell
MEYERS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
DAVID MEYERS
Respondent:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Brett Locklear
as 23-4245
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRETT ANDREW LOCKLEAR
GOUL'D, ESTATE et al v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
SALIMABDU GOUL'D, ESTATE and ABDU-SALIM GOULD
Defendant:
MR. LOCKLEAR, STEVEN JACOBS, MS. LOWERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
Randy Dingle v. Benjamin Khan
as 23-1329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
BENJAMIN KHAN, Judge, TIMOTHY J. PETERKIN, Attorney, RICHARD MARTIN HUTSON, II, Trustee and others
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Jr., ELLEN B. HANCOX, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
