Cases 71 - 80 of 633
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gulevski et al v. ABM Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06110
Plaintiff:
Mitana Gulevski
Defendant:
ABM Industries, Inc. and Pashe Redzovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv04385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Romano et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07113
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Romano and Raquel Romano
Defendant:
The City of New York, A Russo Wrecking, Inc., ABM Janitorial Northeast, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Steffen v. The City of New York et al et al
as 1:2010cv07136
Plaintiff:
Peter Steffen
Defendant:
The City of New York et al, A Russo Wrecking, ABM Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Arthur v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07135
Plaintiff:
Samantha Arthur
Defendant:
The City of New York, A Russo Wrecking, ABM Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Rolon et al v. A Russo Wrecking et al
as 1:2010cv06993
Plaintiff:
Israel Rolon, Jr. and Raquel Rolon
Defendant:
A Russo Wrecking, ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Northeast Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Kebbe v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07000
Plaintiff:
Claude Kebbe and Christine Kebbe
Defendant:
The City of New York, A Russo Wrecking, Inc., ABM Janitorial Northeast, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
