Cases 71 - 80 of 336
Bryant et al v. ADT, LLC
as 0:2021cv62509
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Bryant, Kamisha Wagner, Lakeivian Winston and others
Defendant:
ADT, LLC d/b/a ADT SECURITY SERVICES, a Delaware limited liability company and ADT, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as ADT Sercurity Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Desaigoudar v. ADT, LLC
as 8:2021cv02796
Plaintiff:
Sherri Desaigoudar
Defendant:
ADT, LLC d/b/a ADT Security Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Rojas v. ADT, LLC
as 1:2021cv06374
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02905
Plaintiff:
SHANA DOTY and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and TELESFORO AVILES
Petitioner:
ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
Signal Technology Foundation v. ADT LLC
as 5:2021cv07427
Plaintiff:
Signal Technology Foundation
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Strange v. ADT LLC.
as 9:2021cv81818
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
ADT LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson et al v. ADT LLC
as 5:2021cv00432
Plaintiff:
Myeisha Thompson
Defendant:
ADT LLC doing business as Blue By ADT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ashraf v. ADT, LLC
as 8:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
Amad Ashraf
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ashraf v. ADT, LLC
as 1:2021cv02037
Plaintiff:
AMAD ASHRAF
Defendant:
ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sidik v. Royal Sovereign International
as 21-1581
Defendant / Appellee:
Royal Centurian Inc., ADT LLC, BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Sidik, as Administrator of the Estate of Kristen A. Sidik, deceased, as Parent and Natural Guardian of K.S., an Infant, as Parent and Natural Guardian of C.S., an Infant, Individually
Defendant:
Royal Sovereign Qingdao, AKA RS Qingdao, RS Ningbo, Inc. and Taishan City Kexinte Motor Products Co., LTD.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
