Cases 71 - 80 of 520
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Andersons Neck, LLC
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and ADLIFE Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Andersons Neck, LLC doing business as Andersons Neck Oyster Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Anderson v. GlobalTel Link
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
GlobalTel Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan K Bingham
Defendant:
David E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2023cv81527
Petitioner:
Christine Favara Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. Nutra Pure, LLC
as 1:2023cv00008
Defendant:
Nutra Pure, LLC doing business as CBDPure also known as CBD Pure and CBD Pure
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Neamo v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Mark L. Neamo
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Anderson and Tim Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drayton v. Anderson et al
as 7:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Drayton
Defendant:
Warden Daivd Anderson and Assist. Warden Bataman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes-Hernandez v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Defendant:
Ketterer, Browne & Associates, LLC, Monsanto Company, Bayer Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Elvira Reyes-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
