Cases 71 - 80 of 3,762
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BANKS v. DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TORO v. BANK OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
YANILDA A. TORO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WALLACE v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 2:2023cv23170
Plaintiff:
SHYAN LACHEL WALLACE
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DODSON v. BANK OF AMERICA'S HEADQUARTERS
as 2:2023cv23398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA'S HEADQUARTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCLEAN v. SUMITRA et al
as 3:2023cv22842
Plaintiff:
RUTH T. MCLLEAN and RUTH T. MCLEAN
Defendant:
AIMEE D. SUMITRA doing business as PNC BANK, N.A., THOMAS W. MORRIS doing business as PNC BANK, N.A., OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHITESTER v. US BANK et al
as 3:2023cv22554
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH CHITESTER
Defendant:
US BANK and FAY SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
BMO BANK N.A. v. ADVANCE TRUCK DIAGNOSTICS & REPAIRS
as 2:2023cv22773
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank, N.A. and BMO BANK N.A.
Defendant:
Advance Truck Diagnostics & Repairs, LLC and ADVANCE TRUCK DIAGNOSTICS & REPAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
