Cases 71 - 80 of 526
PINKNEY v. NICHOLSON et al
as 2:2018cv05078
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL PINKNEY
Defendant:
CARROLL NICHOLSON and EAGLE TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARROLL v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv04959
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KENNEDY v. GETTYSBURG COLLEGE et al
as 2:2018cv04488
Defendant:
PHI SIGMA KAPPA FRATERNITY, GETTYSBURG COLLEGE, PHI SIGMA KAPPA DRUID ALUMNI ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
KELSI KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MCGILL v. CARROLL et al
as 2:2018cv02635
Plaintiff:
BENEDICT MCGILL
Defendant:
DAVON L. CARROLL and ESHAI CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETOFF v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PETOFF
Defendant:
KEVIN SUTTER, MICHAEL HOLMAN, GARY SEYMOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRIME ENERGY AND CHEMICAL, LLC v. TUCKER ARENSBERG, P.C. et al
as 2:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
PRIME ENERGY AND CHEMICAL, LLC
Defendant:
TUCKER ARENSBERG, P.C. , MICHAEL A. SHINER and KENNETH L. CARROLL, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL v. USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CARROLL
Defendant:
USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and TRANS UNION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
