Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wall v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2009cv01124
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wall
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds and Christopher Woods
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. Brevard County Jail Complex, et al
as 6:2008cv02048
Plaintiff:
John Lee Davis
Defendant:
Brevard County Jail Complex, Sandra Esposito, Kristina Isbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.P. Moller- Maersk A/S v. 64 Pieces of Stone & Shell Furniture et al
as 2:2008cv06649
Plaintiff:
A.P. Moller- Maersk A/S and A.P. Moller- Maersk A/S
Defendant:
64 Pieces of Stone & Shell Furniture, Multi Trans Shipping Agency, Inc., Carducci, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
EGERSHEIM et al v. GAUD et al
as 1:2007cv05116
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN EGERSHEIM and CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Defendant:
LOUIS ANTHONIO GAUD, PHILIP DIBARTOLO and REMIX ENTERTAINMENT VENTURE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Woods v. Excell Marine Corporation
as 1:2007cv00376
Plaintiff:
Christopher Woods
Defendant:
Excell Marine Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
