Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Hope in the City v. City of Austin TX
as 08-51190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOPE IN THE CITY INC, doing business as Hope in the City Church
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AUSTIN TEXAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garza v. City of Austin, Texas et al
as 1:2008cv00534
Plaintiff:
Ricardo J. Garza and Ricardo J. Garza
Defendant:
City of Austin, Texas, Clinton Friday and Brian Lee Babyak
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hope in the City, Inc. v. The City of Austin, Texas
as 1:2007cv01038
Plaintiff:
Hope in the City, Inc., Hope in the City, Inc. and Hope in the City, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Austin, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snelling et al v. City of Austin, Texas et al
as 1:2007cv00995
Plaintiff:
Eugene Darryl Snelling and Myra Snelling
Defendant:
City of Austin, Texas and Thomas O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buesgens v. Freeland et al
as 1:2007cv00444
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Buesgens
Defendant:
Christine C. Freeland, Debra Wehmeier, Charles Eads Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buesgens v. Freeland et al
as 8:2007cv01363
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Buesgens
Defendant:
Christine C. Freeland, Debra Wehmeier, Charles Eads Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buesgens v. Travis County, Texas et al
as 6:2007cv00150
Defendant:
Travis County, Texas, City of Austin, Texas, State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Buesgens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
