Cases 71 - 80 of 204
GARCIA v. WELLPATH
as 1:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO GARCIA
Defendant:
WELLPATH and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv03058
Defendant:
JOHN STEINHART, DR. THOMAS LEHMAN, DR. LITTLES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briley v. Howell et al
as 1:2020cv00756
Defendant:
John Steinhart, Dr. Courtney Rogers, Correct Care Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Briley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claritt v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC
as 3:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
George Claritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, David McDermott, CO McCafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Rasheda Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Shoaf et al
as 3:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Bennie Anderson
Defendant:
Doctors, Medical Personnel, and Employees of the J.C. Blair Hospital in Huntingdon, PA, M.D. Petz, J.C. Blair Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIBY v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2020cv01157
Defendant:
OLIVARI, JANE/JOHN DOE, GEORGE MEINTEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VONE CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOKS v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTION et al
as 2:2020cv01116
Defendant:
SAMIRRAH MINNIS, TANISHA DAVIS, MILANO GIANNONE and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC., WELLPATH LLC and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
