Cases 71 - 80 of 244
Gaffney et al v. Chronister et al
as 8:2021cv02488
Plaintiff:
Terri Sussman Gaffney and Sarah K. Sussman
Defendant:
Chad Chronistor, Jason Gardillo, Jonathan Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Brizendine et al
as 8:2021cv02453
Plaintiff:
Rene Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jordan Brizendine and Chad Chronister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRONISTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49550
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CHRONISTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephanie Salazar Chronister v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv06336
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Salazar Chronister
Petitioner:
Walmart Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brauning v. Christian et al
as 6:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wayne Brauning
Defendant:
John Gilbert Christian, Charles Steven Kessinger, Lori Lynn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMCO Insurance Company v. Chronister Oil Company et al
as 3:2021cv03143
Plaintiff:
AMCO Insurance Company and Depositors Insurance Company
Defendant:
April Mohn and Chronister Oil Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Allah El v. Silber et al
as 8:2021cv01476
Defendant:
Bruce Kirkpatrick Eason, David Silber, Argentina Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Ramel Born Allah El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Chronister (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2021cv01165
Petitioner:
Vernon Jewel Pearson, III
Respondent:
Chad Chronister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hoke v. Chronister et al
as 8:2021cv01167
Plaintiff:
Sol Hoke
Defendant:
Chad Chronister and Deputy Resto-Riversa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. Regional Care Association et al
as 1:2021cv02040
Defendant:
Kathy Chronister, Regional Care Association and Regional Care Association Simple Plan
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
