Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Harper v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv02521
Plaintiff:
William Charles Harper
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, K. Williams, Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumner Anesthesia Associates, Inc. et al v. Hubbell et al
as 3:2009cv00705
Plaintiff:
Sumner Anesthesia Associates, Inc., Thomas M. Carter, Rex Leatherwood and others
Defendant:
Richard L. Hubbell, Russell E. Edwards and Michael W. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Bateman et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv01186
Plaintiff:
Rodger Bateman, Shannon Byrd, Bendick Brorson and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Beth Nunnick, Nancy Hale and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Currie v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv02810
Appellant:
Stella Marie Currie
Appellee:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Curry v. USA
as 3:2008cv00487
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cobie Fugate Curry
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv01283
Petitioner:
Marcus A. Curry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Provost v. Corrections Corporations of America et al
as 2:2008cv02488
Plaintiff:
Douglas Provost
Defendant:
Corrections Corporations of America, James Polk, Shirley Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. Walton et al
as 2:2008cv02211
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Walton, James Polk, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Mills et al
as 2:2008cv02139
Petitioner:
Derrick LaKeith Brown
Respondent:
Marcel Mills, Jeremy Hensley, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
