Cases 71 - 80 of 104
Smith v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dee Ann Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fitts-Humphrey v. Whitley et al
as 3:2011cv00939
Petitioner:
Lawson Daniel Fitts-Humphrey
Respondent:
Lawrence Ray Whitley and Dee David Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Gay et al
as 3:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Freeman
Defendant:
Dee David Gay, Joann Graves, Rick Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dees-Johnson v. Grundman et al
as 3:2011cv00811
Plaintiff:
Thelma Dees-Johnson
Defendant:
Jeanine Hines Watts Grundman and Darron Grundman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Stevens v. Sumner County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 3:2010cv01088
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Stevens
Defendant:
Sumner County Criminal Justice Center, Dee David Gray, Lori Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Troutt et al
as 3:2010cv01009
Plaintiff:
Chris Chapman
Defendant:
Sonya Troutt, Dee David Gay, C. Wyane Hyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Pension Plan for Hourly Employees of United States Pipe and Foundry Company
as 1:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dee Snyder, Sr.
Defendant:
Pension Plan for Hourly Employees of United States Pipe and Foundry Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Houston v. Memphis Mental Health Institute et al
as 2:2010cv02679
Plaintiff:
Carla Houston
Defendant:
Memphis Mental Health Institute, Family Counseling, CSA'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walker et al v. Vitobob Furniture
as 3:2010cv00742
Plaintiff:
Dee Anne Walker and The United Furniture Workers Pension Plan A
Defendant:
Vitobob Furniture
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Graves v. Gay
as 3:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Robert Neal Graves
Defendant:
David Dee Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
