Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 124
In re: Gerald Bush We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4040
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: GERALD BUSH
Defendant - Respondent: CRAIG B. SOKOLOW, Esquire, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Nominal Respondent: C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Cornelius Badger, Jr.
as 14-3435
Petitioner - Petitioner: In re: CORNELIUS A. BADGER, JR.
Defendant - Respondent: STRYDEN INC, NOVOS ASSOCIATES LLC, MAJOR LOGISTICS LLC and others
Nominal Respondent: C. DARNELL JONES, II
Larry Jones v. Kenneth McKee
as 14-1822
Petitioner - Appellant: LARRY DARNELL JONES
Respondent - Appellee: KENNETH T. MCKEE, Warden
Larry Jones v. Kenneth McKee
as 14-1797
Petitioner - Appellant: LARRY DARNELL JONES
Respondent - Appellee: KENNETH T. MCKEE, Warden
Jones v. Lawton Correctional Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00510
Plaintiff: Kendrick Darnell Jones
Defendant: Lawton Correctional Facility, Hector Rios and Captain Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. KENNEDY
as 1:2014cv00647
Petitioner: KEVIN DARNELL JONES
Respondent: Kathleen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00085
Plaintiff: KEVIN DARNELL JONES
Defendant: FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA, MAJOR K BEASLEY, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Jones v. Raymond Toomb
as 14-1235
Petitioner - Appellant: LARRY DARNELL JONES
Respondent - Appellee: RAYMOND G. TOOMBS, Warden
JONES v. KENNEDY
as 5:2014cv00076
Petitioner: KEVIN DARNELL JONES
Respondent: KATHLEEN KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nieves v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02449
Plaintiff: George Nieves
Defendant: The City of New York, Darnell Cabbel and Darnell Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?