Cases 71 - 80 of 119
Payten v. Duke
as 7:2014cv00023
Petitioner:
Albert Cloyd Payten
Respondent:
David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bryce v. Duke et al
as 7:2014cv00011
Plaintiff:
Darryn Cortese Bryce
Defendant:
David Duke and Wichita County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Connor et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Wesley M Barry
Defendant:
NFN Connor, NFN Hamilton, Unknown Named Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry v. Connor et al
as 7:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Wesley M Barry
Defendant:
NFN Connor, NFN Hamilton, Unknown Named Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funk et al v Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv05933
Plaintiff:
Robert Ahern, Ingrid Ain, Martin J Ain and others
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Garza v. Wichita County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jerry Joe Garza
Defendant:
Wichita County Sheriff's Office, David Duke and NFN Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abel Rodriguez v. David Duke, et al
as 13-10427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABEL RODRIGUEZ, also known as Domingo Martinez
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DUKE, Wichita County Sheriff, DR. DANIEL BOLIN, WICHITA COUNTY TEXAS and others
Duffie et al v. Wichita County et al
as 7:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Larry Duffie , Alice Stoddard , Sheryl Ware and others
Defendant:
Wichita County, David Duke, Kevin Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pennington v. Terry et al
as 2:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Scottie Dales Pennington
Defendant:
Bob Terry, David Dukes, Ken Sircy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Wichita County, Texas et al
as 7:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Wichita County, Texas, Wichita County Sheriff Office, David Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
