Cases 71 - 80 of 183
Childers v. Clanton Police Dept. et al(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00985
Plaintiff:
Leslie Renee Childers
Defendant:
Clanton Police Dept., Daniel Eric Smitherman and Katrina Caver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01634
Plaintiff:
Cedric De'Von Lowe
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Terressa T Pulliam, Jefferson County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Alabama Dept of Corrections
as 6:2014cv01527
Plaintiff:
Israel Bates, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Sammy Howard
Defendant:
Alabama Dept. of Corrections, COI Rains, Gary Hetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. Reputation.com et al
as 2:2014cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marian A Blocker
Defendant:
Reputation.com, Spokeo.com, Tyler Stampfli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Jefferson Co Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Timothy X Jackson
Defendant:
Jefferson Co Jail, Adamsville Police Dept, American Family Care and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dean Wooten
Defendant:
United States of America Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Dept. of Justice
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brooks v. Arrington et al
as 2:2013cv02332
Plaintiff:
Craig Adolph Brooks
Defendant:
Lloyd Arrington, R. M. Kent, Donna Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huston v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2013cv02272
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Huston
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Jefferson County, Alabama Medica Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
