Cases 71 - 80 of 126
Haskins v. DeRose et al
as 1:2010cv02509
Plaintiff:
Anthony Haskins
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Tom Toolan and Laura Fishel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOURBRINE v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2010cv06847
Petitioner:
HENRY SOURBRINE
Respondent:
LOUIS GIORLA, WILLIS BERRY, JR., ELLEN GREEN CEISLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph-Ali v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2010cv02387
Plaintiff:
Samira Randolph-Ali
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Harrisburg Bureau of Police, Charles G. Kellar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jesus-Nunez v. DeRose
as 4:2010cv02200
Petitioner:
Edward Jesus-Nunez
Respondent:
Dominick DeRose and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chambers v. DeRose et al
as 4:2010cv02070
Petitioner:
Eric Anthony Chambers
Respondent:
Dominick L. DeRose, Dauphin County Prison, United States Probation & Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2010cv01989
Plaintiff:
Bogart Justin Williams
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01983
Petitioner:
Norrel Armstrong
Respondent:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick DeRose and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01656
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01491
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Rose et al
as 1:2010cv01241
Plaintiff:
Cyrus R Sanders
Defendant:
Emanuel Rose, Hewitt, Counselor "Jill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
