Cases 71 - 80 of 456
Loper v. Boone et al
as 3:2020cv01482
Plaintiff:
Malik Derrick Loper
Defendant:
T. Walter, John Doe, Z.W. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00139
Defendant:
PRESIDENT, C.E.O., OWNER ACCREDITATION, AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT SECURITY, LLC and SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MCCRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WALSH v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2020cv00118
Defendant:
KEVIN COWAN, JOHN DOES #1-20, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB DANIEL WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRAGG v. PILLAI et al
as 2:2020cv00581
Defendant:
DR. PUSHKALAI PILLAI, ROBERT GILMORE, TRACY SHAWLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK N. BRAGG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Warden of SCI-Smithfield
as 1:2020cv00251
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Smithfield and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Derrick Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
OLIVER v. COX GARAGE DOORS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01573
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. OLIVER
Defendant:
APRIL MARIE LEMMON and COX GARAGE DOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCRAY v. TICE et al
as 2:2020cv00360
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS COUNTY, PA., THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT TICE
Petitioner:
DERRICK MCCRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARLISLE et al v. CARLISLE et al
as 2:2019cv01498
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. CARLISLE and BARBARA CARLISLE
Defendant:
DERRICK A. CARLISLE, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT, FARM SERVICE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
