Cases 71 - 80 of 322
Hinton v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2021ct03044
Defendant:
John Herring, Erik A. Hooks, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry James-El v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6188
Defendant / Appellee:
PAULA JONES, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DAC, FNU KENNETH DIGGS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES
Steven Powers v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6138
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN WAYNE POWERS
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of Department of Public Safety
Everette v. Dillard et al
as 5:2021ct03023
Plaintiff:
Tariq Everette and Tariq Elijah Everette El
Defendant:
Sean T. Dillard, Todd E. Ishee and Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03021
Plaintiff:
Michael Collins Wilson, Byron McNeely, Kenneth Leonard Dunbar and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, John Herring, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myles v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2021hc02006
Respondent:
Department of Public Safety, Erik A. Hooks, Sarah Liaguno and others
Petitioner:
Devontay D. Myles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ager v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03382
Defendant:
Ms. Bullard, Tracy W. Dailey, Michelle Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Leon M. Ager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. HOOKS
as 1:2020cv01179
Respondent:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
JOSEPH EARL CLARK, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newell v. Roy Cooper Governor's COVID-19 Task Force et al
as 5:2020ct03378
Defendant:
Warren County Municipality, Joshua Stein, Todd Ishee and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert Robinson, Jr. v. Erik Hooks
as 20-7878
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERBERT J. ROBINSON, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
