Cases 71 - 80 of 187
MASON et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv05163
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE ELIZABETH MASON, VINCENT T. MASON, JR. and CRYSTAL MASON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, JOHN FLEMING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLEMINGS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FLEMINGS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv02148
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Fleming
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FLEMINGS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2013cv00193
Plaintiff:
THOMAS FLEMINGS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and THE BOARD OF PAROLE, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMING v. COLLIER
as 2:2013cv03901
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. FLEMING, III
Defendant:
COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEMING v. HARLOW
as 1:2013cv00147
Petitioner:
THOMAS JEFFERSON FLEMING
Respondent:
MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chronister v. Fleming et al
as 1:2013cv01235
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Chronister
Defendant:
Janet Fleming, Samuel Miles , Michael Schiffhauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Fleming v. Sauers
as 3:2013cv00471
Petitioner:
David Fleming
Respondent:
Delbert Sauers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLEMINGS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE
as 1:2013cv00048
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. FLEMINGS
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE and MICHAEL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
