Cases 71 - 80 of 103
Freeman v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00050
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Freeman
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Pennington v. Astrue
as 7:2011cv00446
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
William Freeman Pennington
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States ex rel. Tamika Nottingham, et al v. Delores Freeman Thomas, et al
as 4:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES , Commonwealth of Virginia and Tamika Nottingham
Defendant:
New Season Clinical Services, LLC, Delores Freeman Thomas and Jane Does #1-99
Movant:
UNITED STATES
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Freeman v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv09746
Plaintiff:
Lawren V. Freeman
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc. , Amsted Rail Co. Inc., General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
Sherrie D. Freeman
Defendant:
OfficeMax Incorporated and Arthur Gilbert and Rosalinde Gilbert 1982 Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Freeman Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Freeman Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boyer v. Freeman et al
as 1:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
Reginald Boyer
Defendant:
Robert Freeman , Russell Roberts and Stephanie Stoltzus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Freeman et al v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
as 7:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Flora G. Freeman and Samuel L. Freeman
Defendant:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Freeman v. USA
as 3:2010cv00466
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Antonio G. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
