Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 352
Moulton v. MCCROSSON et al
as 1:2020cv02092
Defendant: ERIC ROSENFELD, TERRY STINSON, HARVEY J. BAZAAR and others
Plaintiff: Keith Moulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
FABER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79500
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: RYAN FABER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00412
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Faber v. Cornell University
as 3:2020cv00471
Plaintiff: Alec Faber
Defendant: Cornell University
Intervenor: Olivia Haynie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
QED LLC et al v. Faber Daeufer & Itrato, P.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02767
Plaintiff: QED LLC and Ronald J Friedman
Defendant: David Nicolaisen, Faber Daeufer & Itrato, P.C. and Kenneth Itrato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FABER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18048
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: JASON FABER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FABER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/7:20-CV-18048
Plaintiff: FABER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
PRL USA Holdings, Inc. v. Designerbrandsforless, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01670
Plaintiff: PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
Defendant: DOES 1-10, inclusive, Designerbrandsforless, Inc., Jacqueline Jarrot and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Diane Faber
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00009
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Earl Faber v. Randy Pfister
as 20-1002
Petitioner / Appellant: EARL FABER
Respondent / Appellee: RANDY PFISTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?