Cases 71 - 80 of 814
Rahdar et al v. City of Friendswood et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Fred Rahdar and Kobra Ghorbani
Defendant:
City of Friendswood, Bob Weiners, B Milling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Houston v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Michael Fred Houston
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Fred Rhadar, Kobra Ghorbani and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
City of Friendswood Texas, b milling, M Kulhanek and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Dixon v. State of Texas Skyview Unit
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Texas Skyview Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Garcia et al
as 5:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Ralph B. Torres, III
Defendant:
Lee Roy Garcia, Daniel Garcia, Don LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howie, derivatively on behalf of Camber Energy Inc. v. Doris et al
as 4:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Robert Howie, derivatively on behalf of Camber Energy Inc.
Defendant:
James A Doris, Frank A. Barker, Jr., Fred S Zeidman and others
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Warden, NFN Wonders, NFN Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Skyview Unit Food Services
as 3:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Fred A Dixon, Jr
Defendant:
Skyview Unit Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Memphis Tennessee Courts
as 3:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Memphis Tennessee Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. State Of Texas et al
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Texas and Washington DC Welfare Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
