Cases 71 - 80 of 208
Moore v. Schilling et al
as 7:2012cv00571
Defendant:
Dr. Ammonette, Harold Clerks, Dr. Sonja John and others
Plaintiff:
Monica Minor Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00584
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Jimmy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. Taylor et al
as 5:2012cv00077
Defendant:
Judge William G. Barkley, County of Albemarle, Judge Cheryl V. Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown v. Mobashar et al
as 7:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Javon D. Brown
Defendant:
Nasseer Mobashar and Fred Schilling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Hildebrand et al
as 7:2012cv00213
Defendant:
Bruce R. Conover and Fred D. Hildebrand
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Mobashar et al
as 7:2012cv00202
Plaintiff:
Javon D. Brown
Defendant:
Nasseer Mobashar and Fred Shilling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Brown et al
as 1:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Monica M Moore
Defendant:
Stephen C. Brown, Sonja Johns, Distart Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Mobashar et al
as 1:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Javon D. Brown
Defendant:
Nasseer Mobashar and Fred Shilling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corrigan v. Pflanz et al
as 1:2012mc00012
Plaintiff:
John L. Corrigan
Defendant:
Fred C. Pflanz, A. Hille, D. Barger and others
Tyson et al v. Russell et al
as 7:2012cv00132
Defendant:
Franklin County, Virginia, Highland Lake Inc., Edward C. Park, III and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberley H. Tyson and Mark V. Tyson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
