Cases 71 - 80 of 6,279
JOHNSON v. HENRY et al
as 2:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
AKIL ASIM JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHELLE HENRY, MICHAEL ZAKEN, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMBERT v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv03714
Petitioner:
ERIC X RAMBERT
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RAMBERT v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01666
Petitioner:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
EVANS v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2023cv03589
Petitioner:
WARREN EVANS
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON, LARRY KRASNER and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Worman v. Barasse,Esq et al
as 3:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Worman
Defendant:
Nancy Barasse,Esq, John Henry "Shane" Scanlon,Esq, Ruth Borland,Esq and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. PITTS et al
as 2:2023cv03340
Defendant:
JAMES PITTS, Det. HENRY GLENN, Det. OHMARR JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPELLMAN v. PITTS et al
as 2:2023cv03342
Plaintiff:
INDIA SPELLMAN
Defendant:
FORMER DET. JAMES PITTS, DET. OHMARR JENKINS, DET. HENRY GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. HENRY F. TEICHMANN, INC.
as 2:2023cv01538
Plaintiff:
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
HENRY F. TEICHMANN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DOE v. WEINTRAUB et al
as 2:2023cv03252
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
MATT WEINTRAUB and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LANZO v. GOURLEY et al
as 5:2023cv03204
Petitioner:
MARIO CASANOVA LANZO
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL GOURLEY, STEPHEN G. DIAMANTONI and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
