Cases 71 - 80 of 140
HAINES v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv05599
Plaintiff:
RACHEL HAINES
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SCARNATI v. JOHNTON et al
as 2:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
MISS GLORIA E. SCARNATI
Defendant:
J. JOHNTON, PLEASANT HILLS POST OFFICE, KATHY SHERRED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2013cv05178
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ TORRES
Defendant:
SCOTT MARTIN, PAUL K. SMEAL, JOSEPH P. SHIFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABRANTE v. GUARINI et al
as 5:2013cv04534
Petitioner:
MANUEL E. ABRANTE
Respondent:
VINCENT GUARINI, BONNIE BEAR, ANN HAINES and others
Defendant:
LORI HOSTETLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPEARS et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02451
Plaintiff:
KYLE SPEARS , LAURIE SPEARS , JASON J. BILDERBACK and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , OXYVINYLS, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schreane v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv01057
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Schreane
Defendant:
Jeff Thomas , Chambers, F. Entzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sampson v. Haines
as 4:2013cv00983
Plaintiff:
Earl Sampson
Defendant:
Dennis Haines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ABRANTE v. GAURINI et al
as 5:2012cv06860
Plaintiff:
MANUEL E. ABRANTE, III.
Defendant:
VINCENT GAURINI, LORI HOSTELER, BONNIE BEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
