Cases 71 - 80 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00234
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Holmes v. Aiken County Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00224
Defendant:
J. Whitaker, E. Riddell, Aiken County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Antonio Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Holmes et al v. Hawthorne et al
as 0:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Sheriff Alex Underwood, Evan Robert Hawthorne, Sheriff Max Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Holmes and Philerial Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
John Doe #2, through John Doe #X, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
C. Holmes
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Greene v. Stephan et al
as 1:2019cv03391
Plaintiff:
Latorey Greene and Latorey J. Greene
Defendant:
Capt. Mack, Cheron M. Hess, Warden McKie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Aiken County Detention Center
as 1:2019cv02983
Plaintiff:
Ricky Antonio Holmes
Defendant:
Aiken County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Morris v. Cate et al
as 2:2019cv02814
Defendant:
Marcine Holmes, Jocelyn B. Cate and Department of Social Services (DSS)
Plaintiff:
Hakim Jakuin Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greene v. Stephan et al
as 1:2019cv02386
Defendant:
Cheron M. Hess, Warden McKie, Janine Wrecsizs and others
Plaintiff:
Latorey J. Greene, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Double D Promotions and Staffing LLC v. Nissan of Sumter LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Nissan of Sumter LLC and Terry Holmes Automotive Group
Plaintiff:
Double D Promotions and Staffing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
