Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Randolph Garaux v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-72197
:
In re: RANDOLPH E. GARAUX
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH E. GARAUX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW CATE, JAMES A. YATES, C. HUCKABAY and others
Barry Jameson et al v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
Belton, Belton, P D Brazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
HERRERA v. FARRELL LINES INC.
as 2:2010cv57586
Plaintiff:
FELIPE J. HERRERA
Defendant:
FARRELL LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HERRERA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv42025
Plaintiff:
FELIPE J HERRERA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HERRERA v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42238
Plaintiff:
FELIPE J HERRERA
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HERRERA v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv41841
Plaintiff:
FELIPE J. HERRERA
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Garaux vs. Cate, et al.
as 1:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
Randolph E. Garaux
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, James A. Yates, C. Huckabay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantes v. Woodford et al
as 1:2009cv01863
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Cervantes
Defendant:
J. Woodford, James A. Yates, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Jerbic et al
as 2:2009cv01871
Plaintiff:
Otis Hall
Defendant:
Bradford R. Jerbic, J. Herrera and Sibbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Herrera v. The Internal Revenue Service Of The United States Department Of Revenue et al
as 1:2009cv01708
Plaintiff:
Ann J. Herrera
Defendant:
PFS Investments Inc., PFS Investments Inc., PFS Investments Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interplea
Type:
Federal Tax Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
