Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Spencer v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01089
Plaintiff:
James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King, Cynthia Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell et al v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01076
Plaintiff:
Darrius Bryant Bell and James Edward Spencer
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Troy King, Cynthia Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Holt (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00844
Plaintiff:
James Edward Moore
Defendant:
Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Holt
as 2:2009mc03466
Plaintiff:
James Edward Moore
Defendant:
Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bagley v. Circuit Court of Calhoun 2003-0815 et al
as 1:2009cv01288
Petitioner:
James Edward Bagley
Respondent:
Circuit Court of Calhoun 2003-0815, Cheryl Price and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Franks v. McClain et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00613
Plaintiff:
James Edward Franks
Defendant:
CO I McClain, CO I Nolen, COI Terry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gary v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2007cv01074
Plaintiff:
James Edward Gary, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenny Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Holt et al
as 4:2007cv01786
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Arnold Holt and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Holt et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv00802
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Arnold Holt and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
