Cases 71 - 80 of 151
Mouzon v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv02376
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Mouzon
Defendant:
John Rathman, Becky Clay, D Gladney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States
as 1:2010cv00906
Plaintiff:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. United States
as 6:2010cv00906
Plaintiff:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tamika Dorris v. James Preston, et al
as 10-2195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMIKA DORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PRESTON, Officer, #307, DANIEL BAILY, Officer, #370, STEVEN SCHARF, Officer, #316/102 and others
Rhymer v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00710
Plaintiff:
Steven Rhymer
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00678
Plaintiff:
Hugo Daniel Aguilar
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ybarra v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00702
Plaintiff:
Armando Ybarra
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00686
Plaintiff:
Eric Jerome Brown
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00720
Plaintiff:
John M Taylor
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murrell v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv00706
Plaintiff:
John K Murrell
Defendant:
Constance Reese, B Clay, G Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
